Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics
"There are three kinds of constitution, and an equal number of deviation-forms--perversions, as it were, of them. The constitutions are monarchy, aristocracy, and thirdly that which is based on a property qualification, which it seems appropriate to call timocratic, though most people are wont to call it polity. The best of these is monarchy, the worst timocracy. The deviation from monarchy is tyranny; for both are forms of one-man rule, but there is the greatest difference between them; the tyrant looks to his own advantage, the king to that of his subjects. For a man is not a king unless he is sufficient to himself and excels his subjects in all good things; and such a man needs nothing further; therefore he will not look to his own interests but to those of his subjects; for a king who is not like that would be a mere titular king. Now tyranny is the very contrary of this; the tyrant pursues his own good. And it is clearer in the case of tyranny that it is the worst deviation-form; but it is the contrary of the best that is worst. Monarchy passes over into tyranny; for tyranny is the evil form of one-man rule and the bad king becomes a tyrant. Aristocracy passes over into oligarchy by the badness of the rulers, who distribute contrary to equity what belongs to the city-all or most of the good things to themselves, and office always to the same people, paying most regard to wealth; thus the rulers are few and are bad men instead of the most worthy. Timocracy passes over into democracy; for these are coterminous, since it is the ideal even of timocracy to be the rule of the majority, and all who have the property qualification count as equal. Democracy is the least bad of the deviations;"
3 Quotes
"There are three kinds of constitution, and an equal number of deviation-forms--perversions, as it were, of them. The constitutions are monarchy, aristocracy, and thirdly that which is based on a property qualification, which it seems appropriate to call timocratic, though most people are wont to call it polity. The best of these is monarchy, the worst timocracy. The deviation from monarchy is tyranny; for both are forms of one-man rule, but there is the greatest difference between them; the tyrant looks to his own advantage, the king to that of his subjects. For a man is not a king unless he is sufficient to himself and excels his subjects in all good things; and such a man needs nothing further; therefore he will not look to his own interests but to those of his subjects; for a king who is not like that would be a mere titular king. Now tyranny is the very contrary of this; the tyrant pursues his own good. And it is clearer in the case of tyranny that it is the worst deviation-form; but it is the contrary of the best that is worst. Monarchy passes over into tyranny; for tyranny is the evil form of one-man rule and the bad king becomes a tyrant. Aristocracy passes over into oligarchy by the badness of the rulers, who distribute contrary to equity what belongs to the city-all or most of the good things to themselves, and office always to the same people, paying most regard to wealth; thus the rulers are few and are bad men instead of the most worthy. Timocracy passes over into democracy; for these are coterminous, since it is the ideal even of timocracy to be the rule of the majority, and all who have the property qualification count as equal. Democracy is the least bad of the deviations;"
"هناك ثلاثة أنواع من الدساتير، ومثلها تمامًا من صور الانحراف عنها، أو لنقل فسادها. أما الدساتير فهي: الملكية، والأرستقراطية (حكم النبلاء)، وثالثًا ما يقوم على مؤهل الثروة، والذي يبدو من المناسب أن نطلق عليه "التيموقراطية"، وإن كان معظم الناس اعتادوا تسميته "البوليتيا" (الحكومة الدستورية). أفضل هذه الدساتير هي الملكية، وأسوأها التيموقراطية.
أما الانحراف عن الملكية فهو الطغيان؛ فكلاهما شكل من أشكال حكم الفرد الواحد، لكن الفارق بينهما عظيم؛ فالطاغية ينظر إلى مصلحته الخاصة، بينما الملك ينظر إلى مصلحة رعيته. فالمرء لا يكون ملكًا إلا إذا كان مكتفيًا بذاته ومتفوقًا على رعيته في كل الفضائل؛ ومثل هذا الرجل لا يحتاج إلى شيء آخر؛ ولذلك لن ينظر إلى مصالحه الخاصة بل إلى مصالح رعيته؛ فالملك الذي لا يكون كذلك هو مجرد ملك بالاسم. أما الطغيان فهو نقيض هذا تمامًا؛ فالطاغية يسعى وراء مصلحته الشخصية. ومن الواضح في حالة الطغيان أنه أسوأ صور الانحراف؛ ولكن نقيض الأفضل هو الأسوأ. تتحول الملكية إلى طغيان؛ فالطغيان هو الصورة الشريرة لحكم الفرد الواحد، والملك السيئ يصبح طاغية.
وتتحول الأرستقراطية إلى أوليغارشية (حكم القلة) بسبب سوء الحكام، الذين يوزعون ما يخص المدينة – كل الخيرات أو معظمها – على أنفسهم خلافًا للعدل، ويمنحون المناصب دائمًا لنفس الأشخاص، مع إيلاء الثروة جل اهتمامهم؛ وهكذا يصبح الحكام قلة من الأشرار بدلًا من الأجدرين.
وتتحول التيموقراطية إلى ديمقراطية؛ فهما متلاصقتان، إذ إن غاية التيموقراطية نفسها هي أن تكون حكم الأغلبية، وكل من يملك مؤهل الثروة يُعد متساويًا. والديمقراطية هي أقل الانحرافات سوءًا."
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics
"The beauty of the soul shines out when a man bears with composure one heavy mischance after another, not because he does not feel them, but because he is a man of high and heroic temper."
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics
"Philosophy can make people sick."
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics
✉️
Get more quotes like Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics's — every morning.
Join thousands of wisdom seekers getting daily quotes from 300,000+ curated sources.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
🎉 Check your inbox to confirm your subscription!